| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MEG Magnetoencephalography neurosurgery epilepsy
Magnetoencephalography in neurosurgery.BioMag Laboratory, Engineering Centre, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. jyrki.makela@hus.fi OBJECTIVE: To present applications of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in studies of neurosurgical patients. METHODS: MEG maps magnetic fields generated by electric currents in the brain, and allows the localization of brain areas producing evoked sensory responses and spontaneous electromagnetic activity. The identified sources can be integrated with other imaging modalities, e.g., with magnetic resonance imaging scans of individual patients with brain tumors or intractable epilepsy, or with other types of brain imaging data. RESULTS: MEG measurements using modern whole-scalp instruments assist in tailoring individual therapies for neurosurgical patients by producing maps of functionally irretrievable cortical areas and by identifying cortical sources of interictal and ictal epileptiform activity. The excellent time resolution of MEG enables tracking of complex spaciotemporal source patterns, helping, for example, with the separation of the epileptic pacemaker from propagated activity. The combination of noninvasive mapping of subcortical pathways by magnetic resonance imaging diffusion tensor imaging with MEG source localization will, in the near future, provide even more accurate navigational tools for preoperative planning. Other possible future applications of MEG include the noninvasive estimation of language lateralization and the follow-up of brain plasticity elicited by central or peripheral neural lesions or during the treatment of chronic pain. CONCLUSION: MEG is a mature technique suitable for producing preoperative "road maps" of eloquent cortical areas and for localizing epileptiform activity. PMID: 16955031 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Consistency of interictal and ictal onset localization using magnetoencephalography in patients with partial epilepsy.Department of Radiology, University of California at San Francisco, California, USA. OBJECT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the spatial accuracy of interictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in localizing the primary epileptogenic focus in comparison with alternative MEG-derived estimates such as ictal onset recording or sensory mapping of the periphery where seizures manifest. METHODS: During this retrospective study of 12 patients with epilepsy who had undergone successful magnetic source (MS) imaging with the aid of a dual 37-channel biomagnetometer as well as simultaneous MEG/electroencephalography (EEG) recordings, ictal events were observed in five patients and quantitative comparisons of interictal spike and ictal seizure onset source localizations were made. In the eight patients who had presented with sensorimotor seizure, source localization of cortical sites concordant with seizure foci was determined using somatosensory functional mapping, and the results were quantitatively compared with interictal spike source localizations. Interictal spike sources demonstrated on MEG localized to the same region as the corresponding ictal event or somatosensory source localizations. The mean distance between the ictal foci and interictal spike sources was 1.1 +/- 0.3 cm. Results of functional somatosensory mapping in patients with sensorimotor seizures demonstrated that seizure sources consistently colocalized with interictal MEG spike sources, with a mean distance of 1.5 +/- 0.4 cm. No systematic directional bias was observed. Interictal sources tended to be tightly clustered, and the mean ellipsoid volume, defined by one standard deviation of the source spatial coordinates, was 1 cm3. CONCLUSIONS: Interictal spike localizations on MEG were concordant with ictal and, where relevant, functional somatosensory mapping localizations. These findings support the interpretation of interictal spikes on MEG as a useful and effective noninvasive method for localizing primary seizure foci. PMID: 12691410 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Magnetoencephalography-directed surgery in patients with neocortical epilepsy.Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena California, USA. amamelak@coh.org OBJECT: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and magnetic source (MS) imaging are techniques that have been increasingly used for preoperative localization of epileptic foci and areas of eloquent cortex. The use of MEG examinations must be carefully balanced against the high cost and technological investments required to perform these studies, particularly when less expensive alternative localization methods are available. To help elucidate the value of MEG, the authors have critically reviewed their experience with whole-head MEG in the case management of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. METHODS: The authors identified 23 patients with suspected focal epilepsy who underwent whole-head MEG and MS imaging at Huntington Memorial Hospital and, subsequently, underwent invasive intracranial electrode monitoring and electrocorticography (ECoG) to localize the zone of seizure origin for surgical resection. The results of the MS imaging were retrospectively stratified into three groups by the number of interictal spikes recorded during a 4-hour recording session: Class I (no spikes), Class II (< or = five spikes), and Class III (> or = six spikes). Class III was further subdivided according to the clustering density of the interictal spikes: Class IIIA represents a mean distance between interictal spikes of 4 mm or greater (that is, diffusely clustered) and Class IIIB represents a mean distance between interictal spikes of less than 4 mm (that is, densely clustered). The authors analyzed these groups to determine to what extent the results of MS imaging correlated with the ECoG-determined zone of seizure origin. In addition, they assessed whether the MS imaging study provided critical localization data and correlated with surgical outcome following resection. A statistical analysis of these correlations was also performed. Of the 40 patients studied, 23 underwent invasive monitoring, including 13 with neocortical epilepsy, four with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, and six with suspected neocortical epilepsy that could not be clearly localized by ECoG. Depth electrodes were used in nine cases, subdural grids in nine cases, depth electrodes followed by subdural grids and strips in four cases, and intraoperative ECoG in one case. Electrocorticography was able to localize the zone of seizure origin in 16 (70%) of 23 cases. In 11 (69%) of the 16 cases in which ECoG was able to localize the zone of seizure origin, the interictal spikes on the MS images were classified as Class IIIB (densely clustered) and regionally correlated to the MS imaging-determined localization in all cases (that is, the same lobe). In contrast, no Class IIIB cases were identified when ECoG was unable to localize the zone of seizure origin. This difference showed a trend toward, but did not achieve, statistical significance (p < 0.23), presumably because of the relatively small number of cases available for analysis. In three cases (all Class IIIB), MS imaging was used to guide invasive electrodes to locations that otherwise would not have been targeted and provided unique localization data, not evident from other imaging modalities, that strongly influenced the surgical management of the patient. The classification of findings on MS images into subgroups and subsequent statistical analysis generated a model that predicted that Class IIIB MS imaging data are likely to provide reliable information to guide surgical placement of electrodes, but all other data groups do not provide localization information that is reliable enough to guide surgical decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic source imaging can provide unique localization information that is not available when other noninvasive methods are used. Magnetic source imaging appears most useful for cases of neocortical epilepsy. In particular, when an MS imaging study revealed six or more interictal spikes that were densely clustered in a single anatomical location, the MS image was highly correlated with the zone of seizure origin identified by ECoG. In these cases the MS imaging data may be useful to guide placement of intracranial electrodes. PMID: 12405375 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Preoperative simulation of intracerebral epileptiform discharges: synthetic aperture magnetometry virtual sensor analysis of interictal magnetoencephalography data.Division of Neurology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. OBJECT: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has been used for the preoperative localization of epileptic equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) in neocortical epilepsy. Spatial filtering can be applied to MEG data by means of synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM), and SAM virtual sensor analysis can be used to estimate the strength and temporal course of the epileptic source in the region of interest. To evaluate the clinical usefulness of this approach, the authors compare the results of SAM virtual sensor analysis to the results of ECD analysis, subdural electroencephalography (EEG) findings, and surgical outcomes in pediatric patients with neocortical epilepsy. METHODS: Ten pediatric patients underwent MEG, invasive subdural EEG, and cortical resection for neocortical epilepsy. The authors compared the morphological characteristics, quantity, location, and distribution of the epileptiform discharges assessed using SAM and ECD analysis, and subdural EEG findings (interictal discharges and ictal onset zones). In nine patients, MEG revealed clustered ECDs. The region exhibiting the maximum percentage (> or = 70%) of spikes/sharp waves on SAM was colocalized to clustered ECDs in seven patients. In six patients, SAM demonstrated focal spikes; in two, diffuse spikes; and in two others, focal rhythmic sharp waves. These epileptiform discharges were similar to those recorded on subdural EEG. In nine patients, concordant regions containing the maximum percentage of spikes/sharp waves were revealed by SAM and subdural EEG data. The region of the maximum percentage of spikes/sharp waves as demonstrated by SAM was colocalized to the ictal onset zone identified by subdural EEG findings in seven patients and partially colocalized in two. CONCLUSIONS: The SAM virtual sensor analysis revealed morphological characteristics, location, and distribution of epileptiform discharges similar to those shown by subdural EEG recordings. By using SAM it is possible to predict intracerebral interictal epileptiform discharges in the region of interest from noninvasively collected preoperative MEG data. The maximum interictal discharge zone identified by SAM virtual sensors correlated to clustered ECDs and the ictal onset zone on subdural EEG findings. Complementary analyses of ECDs and SAM on three-dimensional MR images can improve delineation of epileptogenic zones and lesions in neocortical epilepsy. PMID: 16871869 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a technique that enables the measurement of the magnetic fields produced by the brain. It is a noninvasive method that allows, similarly to electroencephalography (EEG), to follow the evolution of electrophysiological processes in the millisecond scale. It is used for localizing functional regions of the brain, with a better spatial resolution than EEG, and for assessing the health of sensory pathways. The most important clinical applications of MEG are the presurgical functional localization and the localization of epileptiform activity. PMID: 15929852 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] |